Limitation of liability

Limitation of liability is a central element of contract law, used to regulate the parties responsibility if things go wrong.

Explained – what is limitation of liability?

Limitation of liability means the parties agree to restrict financial responsibility for certain events or losses. It is a common feature of commercial agreements and is used particularly in complex business relationships as part of contractual risk allocation and contractual risk management. An experienced commercial contract lawyer can help formulate such provisions, including a clear limitation of liability clause. Typical areas where limitation of liability is relevant include supply supply agreements, IT agreements and consultancy agreements.

When does the question of limitation of liability arise?

The issue becomes relevant when parties negotiate and draft contracts where the risk of loss, delay or defects is material. Examples include technical services where downtime may cause significant costs, or construction contracts where defective work can lead to extensive consequential damages. In software licence agreements, it is also common for suppliers to agree an exclusion of consequential loss, limiting exposure to direct damages only under a contractual limitation of liability.

Illustration of uneven justice scale symbolising limitation of liability clause in commercial contracts and legal risk allocation.

Key considerations for a limitation of liability

When organisations consider including a limitation of liability clause, several practical factors should be analysed with a commercial contract lawyer to ensure the provision works in practice.

  • Identify which types of loss or cost are covered (for example, direct damages versus indirect damages or consequential damages).
  • Decide whether the limitation should apply to both direct and indirect losses, and whether there is an explicit exclusion of consequential loss.
  • Set a liability cap or cap on damages, for example linked to the contract value.
  • Ensure the clause does not conflict with mandatory law.
  • Consider carve-outs, for example for gross negligence or wilful misconduct.
  • Assess whether contractual insurance requirements should complement the limitation.

By working through these points systematically, the parties can achieve a more balanced agreement and avoid uncertainty later.

Frequently asked questions on limitation of liability

A limitation of liability clause sets boundaries on responsibility for specified losses or costs and often includes a liability cap and clear carve-outs.

It is commonly used in commercial contracts such as consultancy, supply and licence agreements, especially where potential losses may be extensive and hard to forecast.

Force majeure addresses unforeseeable events (for example, natural disasters or war) that excuse performance or liability. Limitation of liability is a deliberate agreement to confine exposure, even for foreseeable events.

Risks arise if the clause is one-sided or unclear. Common issues include:

  • Conflict with mandatory legislation.
  • Failure to carve out wilful misconduct or gross negligence.
  • Disproportionate exposure relative to the contract value.

Both suppliers and customers benefit. Suppliers gain defined boundaries, while customers gain predictability on compensable losses versus excluded categories.

It should clearly set scope and exclusions. Core elements are:

  • Definition of losses covered by the limitation (for example, direct damages and any exclusion of consequential loss).
  • A liability cap, often tied to the contract value.
  • Requirements for notice of loss and timelines for claims.

Retaining a commercial contract lawyer ensures the contractual limitation of liability aligns with the parties’ objectives, including any contractual insurance requirements and practical claims handling.

Contact us

If you prefer phone, please feel free to contact Felix Morling at +46 70 444 42 85

"*" indicates required fields